Which of the following should you NOT use when drafting a discussion board post?

Which of the following should you NOT use when drafting a discussion board post?

• A. Examples of common knowledge, even if unsupported.
• B. References to areas in the lesson or textbook that answer the question.
• C. Your personal thoughts and experiences.
• D. References to scholarly sources that support your position.

Answer: (A)

The emphasis on avoiding examples of common knowledge, even if unsupported, is crucial in a discussion board post for several reasons. Common knowledge typically refers to information that is widely known and accepted, such as basic historical facts or widely recognized scientific principles. When crafting academic or discussion-based responses, it is important to provide evidence and support for positions taken. Unsupported claims, even if they revolve around common knowledge, can weaken the argument being presented as they do not contribute depth or legitimacy to the discussion. In contrast, references to specific areas in the lesson or textbook, personal thoughts and experiences, and citations from scholarly sources all serve to enrich the post, support claims made, and encourage a thoughtful exchange of ideas. Including well-supported references illustrates a connection to course materials and demonstrates engagement with the topic, thereby fostering a more substantive dialogue in an academic setting.

The emphasis on avoiding examples of common knowledge, even if unsupported, is crucial in a discussion board post for several reasons. Common knowledge typically refers to information that is widely known and accepted, such as basic historical facts or widely recognized scientific principles. When crafting academic or discussion-based responses, it is important to provide evidence and support for positions taken. Unsupported claims, even if they revolve around common knowledge, can weaken the argument being presented as they do not contribute depth or legitimacy to the discussion.

In contrast, references to specific areas in the lesson or textbook, personal thoughts and experiences, and citations from scholarly sources all serve to enrich the post, support claims made, and encourage a thoughtful exchange of ideas. Including well-supported references illustrates a connection to course materials and demonstrates engagement with the topic, thereby fostering a more substantive dialogue in an academic setting.